Archive for the ‘Peace Plans’ Category

CAI and Greg Mortenson: Update and New Book

November 23, 2009

Greg Mortenson is on a roll. Over the past 17 years, the organization he founded, the Central Asia Institute (CAI), has built ninety-one schools in tribal regions of Pakistan. Nineteen thousand kids in that country — mostly girls — are receiving an education due to the CAI’s efforts. The organization involves local people — including people in positions of power — in the design and construction of these schools. In this way, the CAI fosters a sense of local ownership of the schools, which helps protect CAI schools from Taliban and other reactionary elements who promote radical religious education for boys and no education at all for girls.

Five years ago, the organization expanded its reach into the mountainous border regions of Afghanistan. Those efforts continue to this day.

These and other accomplishments are summarized in a short article that appeared in the November 22 issue of Parade magazine, a publication that is distributed in many Sunday newspapers. Parade has been chronicling Greg Mortenson’s efforts for several years, thereby giving the CAI much-needed exposure among a broad mainstream audience. That coverage greatly increased the CAI’s donor-base, allowing the organization to expand its program and area of operation.

The CAI’s efforts are perhaps the most effective way to fight terrorism. Ignorant, poor, hungry, vulnerable people make good recruits for terrorist organizations. Educating children helps innoculate them against extremist indoctrination. Educating girls helps strengthen communities and build a just society.

The U.S. and NATO military leadership is beginning to learn these lessons, as indicated by their increased attention to the Central Asia Institute’s work. Let’s hope they come to rely more on the CAI and less on the other organization that has similar initials.

The article concludes with an announcement of Mortenson’s new book Stones Into Schools: Promoting Peace with Books, not Bombs, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

[Read entire article.]

Other Parade articles about Greg Mortenson and the CAI

Previous PeacePundit posts about Greg Mortenson and the CAI

Nonviolent Peaceforce: Saving Civilian Lives, Promoting Peace

November 15, 2009

I attended a talk by Jan Passion and Ellen Furnari, two representatives of Nonviolent Peaceforce, an unarmed, professionally-trained civilian peacekeeping force that works in conflict zones around the world to diffuse violent conflict situations and protect civilians from harm. Here is a brief summary of what they said:

Nonviolent Peaceforce was founded in 2002 by an international meeting in India. The idea of training civilians to serve as an unarmed international peace force and deploying them in conflict zones emerged from the 1999 Hague Appeal for Peace.

Armed combatants will often refrain from attacking their perceived “enemies” or civilian populations if international observers are present. Thus, one way in which Nonviolent Peaceforce is effective is simply by establishing a presence of outside observers in conflict zones. Beyond detering violence by their presence, peaceworkers are trained in negotiation, conflict resolution, protection of civilians, preservation of human rights, and other nonviolent strategies.

Nonviolent Peaceforce takes great measures to remain non-partisan and neutral in conflicts. They don’t want to be perceived as favoring any of the conflicting parties, because that would compromise their effectiveness and perhaps endanger their workers. Instead, their focus is simply on resolving the conflict and protecting civilians.

Armed conflict involves more than just combatants fighting each other or attacking civilians. It usually also involves a chain of command that leads up to political leaders. Nonviolent Peaceforce carefully analyzes the forces and chains of command in a conflict zone and applies pressure at perceived leverage points.

Two war-zones in which Nonviolent Peaceforce demonstrated their effectiveness were in Sri Lanka and the Mindanao region of the Phillipine Islands. They have also worked in Guatamala.

Examples of specific activities that Nonviolent Peaceforce peaceworkers carry out:

  • Bring together combatants or their leaders to resolve conflicts through negotiation.
  • Provide neutral facilities and go-between services so parties in conflicts can communicate with each other without losing face.
  • Diffuse flash-point events.
  • Analyze the causes and complexities of conflicts so as to better understand how to resolve them.
  • Dispell false information and rumors that can spark conflict or cause it to spread and escalate.
  • Protect children and other civilians from forced conscription by armed forces, sometimes by removing them from the conflict-zone.
  • Recover conscripted children and either return them to their families (if that can be done safely) or remove them from the conflict-zone.
  • Provide safe havens, safe periods, and protective accompaniment for civilians who are caught in conflict-zones.

Nonviolent Peaceforce peaceworkers and administrative staff are paid. The organizaton also has many volunteers.

The organization receives funding from a variety of sources, including UNICEF (for work related to children), national governments, member organizations (mostly human-rights and peace oriented), and individuals.

Further information about Nonviolent Peaceforce:

Related Previous PeacePundit Posts

George Will: Get Out of Afghanistan

September 3, 2009

The temperature of Hell just dropped below freezing. Watch for pigs flying overhead.

George F. Will, the conservative political columnist for the Washington Post, wrote in his Sept 1 column that there is no further value in continuing the heavy US military ground-troop deployment in Afghanistan, and that the US should withdraw.

He isn’t exactly advocating peace — he suggests continued use of airstrikes and small Special Forces missions — but his position is much closer to that than Obama’s. The Obama administration is following a policy that tries to mix military force, diplomacy, infrastructure development, and nation-building. Obama already faces criticism of this policy from the left.

Will’s column puts him at odds with most of his fellow conservatives (see The Reaction, below).

Some excerpts from Will’s column, followed by links to some of the reaction:

Time to Get Out of Afghanistan

By George F. Will
Tuesday, September 1, 2009

U.S. strategy — protecting the population — is increasingly troop-intensive while Americans are increasingly impatient about “deteriorating” … conditions. The war already is nearly 50 percent longer than the combined U.S. involvements in two world wars, and NATO assistance is reluctant …

The U.S. strategy is “clear, hold and build.” Clear? Taliban forces can evaporate and then return, confident that U.S. forces will forever be too few to hold gains. …

Military historian Max Hastings says Kabul controls only about a third of the country — “control” is an elastic concept — and ” ‘our’ Afghans may prove no more viable than were ‘our’ Vietnamese, the Saigon regime.” …

Even though violence exploded across Iraq after, and partly because of, three elections, Afghanistan’s recent elections were called “crucial.” To what? They came, they went, they altered no fundamentals… Creation of an effective central government? Afghanistan has never had one. …

Mullen speaks of combating Afghanistan’s “culture of poverty.” But that took decades in just a few square miles of the South Bronx. …

[F]orces should be substantially reduced to serve a comprehensively revised policy: America should do only what can be done from offshore, using intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, airstrikes and small, potent Special Forces units, concentrating on the porous 1,500-mile border with Pakistan, a nation that actually matters.

[Read Entire Article]

The Reaction

Related Peace Pundit Posts

For Inspiration, Read Three Cups of Tea

July 18, 2009

Three Cups of Tea tells how Greg Mortenson found his “calling” building schools in the mountainous tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was written by a partnership between Mortenson and professional writer David Oliver Relin. Briefly:

After serving in the US Army as a medic, and getting degrees in nursing and chemistry, Mortenson still was not sure what he wanted to do with his life. He joined an expedition to climb K2, the world’s second highest peak, but did not reach the top due to the need to rescue other climbers his group encountered. On the way down, he got separated from his group and his porter, took a wrong turn, and found himself, exhausted, in the Pakistani mountain village of Korphe. The villagers there nursed him back to health.

To repay the villagers’ kindness, Mortenson promised to build a school for the village, since the Pakistani government had never done so. Back in the US, he initially had trouble raising the funds to build a school, but eventually convinced Jean Hoerni, a weathy Silicon Valley businessman, to help him. Together, they co-founded the Central Asian Institute (CAI).

However, building the school in Korphe turned out to take a few years, because first a bridge into the village had to be built to allow construction materials for the school to be brought there, not to mention that there were influential Pakistani warlords who wanted a school built in their villages first. Eventually, however, the school in Korphe was built.

Since then CAI has built over 78 schools, plus some wells, water conduits, and other public-works projects in the mountainous areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It continues to do so to this day, despite threats from Taliban mullahs who disagree with educating girls, as well as hate mail from Americans who believe Mortenson is “helping the enemy” (i.e., Muslims).

Mortenson has shrugged all of these problems off, focusing tightly on his mission: building schools, educating girls as well as boys.

In one fascinating chapter of the book, Mortenson is approached by the US military and asked to provide information that could help the military identify targets in the mountain areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. He refuses on the grounds that doing so would not only hurt his credibility with the mountain people, but also might make him a target of Taliban militants. The US military also offers him funding — secretly if he wants it that way. Despite the Central Asian Institute’s then-chronic lack of sufficient funding for all of its projects, he also refuses that offer for the same reasons.

The implications of that exchange are thought provoking. One could argue that the US military would be more effective in countering the Taliban and winning over the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan if, instead of waging war, it “waged peace” by using the Army Corps of Engineers to build public-works projects. For example, Spain’s NATO troops in Afghanistan mainly build water projects, and have a much better relationship with the Afghans — and much lower casualties — than the US troops have.

So the irony is, Mortenson has to refuse military support for what he is doing so that he can keep doing it, but if the US military were doing what he is doing — presumably on a much larger scale because of their greater funding — instead of what they are doing, the situation in the mountains of Pakistan and Afghanistan would be better for all concerned. It seems a bit like a Catch-22.

The only consolation is that important people in the US government have read or are reading Three Cups of Tea. Let’s hope that they learn something from it.

I like the book so much that I have bought dozens of copies and given them to friends, family, and others. I strongly recommend that you get it, read it, and give it to others.

Links to further information:

Support Congr. Jim McGovern’s Afghanistan Timetable Bill

June 23, 2009

Congressman Jim McGovern (D-MA) recently proposed a one-sentence bill calling for the US to state a timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan:

“Not later than December 31, 2009, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report outlining the United States exit strategy for United States military forces in Afghanistan participating in Operation Enduring Freedom.”

He plans to attach that sentence to the 2010 military authorization bill.

Please call your Congressional Representative and express your support for this bill, which is called House Resolution 2404 (H.R. 2404).

For further information, please read this article by defense analyst Robert Naiman:
Congress Should Require an Exit Strategy from Afghanistan

New Greenwald Documentary: Rethink Afghanistan

June 19, 2009

Acclaimed documentary film director Robert Greenwald is currently finishing up a new documentary about the war in Afghanistan. The basic message is that pursuing a military solution in Afghanistan is not working and won’t work, and should be abandoned.

One reason for releasing the film now is that the Obama administration is preparing a “troop surge” in Afghanistan. Among other things, the film points out that even with the “surge”, the troop levels will be far below the half a million troops that the Soviets deployed, which as we all know failed to defeat the Afghan insurgents.

Greenwald is releasing a preliminary version of the film in several parts — four so far, with a fifth due to be released soon. Trailers and the complete segments can be viewed online at the film’s website: RethinkAfghanistan.com.

The released segments:

  • Part 1: what military escalation will achieve in Afghanistan.
  • Part 2: how the war could further destabilize a nuclear-armed Pakistan
  • Part 3: the staggering costs of the war, which could easily exceed $1 trillion.
  • Part 4: civilian casualties

Related Previous PeacePundit Posts:

Changing Obama’s Mindset Toward Peace

May 20, 2009

Howard Zinn wrote an excellent article for the May 2009 issue of The Progressive. It is about the need to push Obama toward progressive policies. It covers a broad range of topics from the history of politicians in America to the current recession, but one part is highly relevant to issues of peace and war. Following the excerpt is a link to the entire article. [Update: Howard Zinn died Jan 27, 2010.]

Excerpt from: “Changing Obama’s Mindset” by Howard Zinn

Obama … said, “It’s not enough to get out of Iraq; we have to get out of the mindset that led us into Iraq.”

What is the mindset that got us into Iraq?

It’s the mindset that says force will do the trick. Violence, war, bombers—that they will bring democracy and liberty to the people.

It’s the mindset that says America has some God-given right to invade other countries for their own benefit. We will bring civilization to the Mexicans in 1846. We will bring freedom to the Cubans in 1898. We will bring democracy to the Filipinos in 1900. You know how successful we’ve been at bringing democracy all over the world.

Obama has not gotten out of this militaristic missionary mindset. He talks about sending tens of thousands of more troops to Afghanistan.

Obama is a very smart guy, and surely he must know some of the history. You don’t have to know a lot to know the history of Afghanistan has been decades and decades and decades and decades of Western powers trying to impose their will on Afghanistan by force: the English, the Russians, and now the Americans. What has been the result? The result has been a ruined country.

This is the mindset that sends 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan, and that says, as Obama has, that we’ve got to have a bigger military. My heart sank when Obama said that. Why do we need a bigger military? We have an enormous military budget. Has Obama talked about cutting the military budget in half or some fraction? No.

We have military bases in more than a hundred countries. We have fourteen military bases on Okinawa alone. Who wants us there? The governments. They get benefits. But the people don’t really want us there. There have been huge demonstrations in Italy against the establishment of a U.S. military base. There have been big demonstrations in South Korea and on Okinawa.

One of the first acts of the Obama Administration was to send Predator missiles to bomb Pakistan. People died. The claim is, “Oh, we’re very precise with our weapons. We have the latest equipment. We can target anywhere and hit just what we want.”

This is the mindset of technological infatuation. Yes, they can actually decide that they’re going to bomb this one house. But there’s one problem: They don’t know who’s in the house. They can hit one car with a rocket from a great distance. Do they know who’s in the car? No.

And later—after the bodies have been taken out of the car, after the bodies have been taken out of the house—they tell you, “Well, there were three suspected terrorists in that house, and yes, there’s seven other people killed, including two children, but we got the suspected terrorists.” But notice that the word is “suspected.” The truth is they don’t know who the terrorists are.

So, yes, we have to get out of the mindset that got us into Iraq, but we’ve got to identify that mindset. And Obama has to be pulled by the people who elected him, by the people who are enthusiastic about him, to renounce that mindset. We’re the ones who have to tell him, “No, you’re on the wrong course with this militaristic idea of using force to accomplish things in the world. We won’t accomplish anything that way, and we’ll remain a hated country in the world.”

[Read entire article]

Demos to End Iraq War & Cut Military Budget

March 13, 2009

March 19 is the 6th anniversary of the start of the Iraq War.

  • Over 4,250 US combat troop deaths
  • Over 30,000 US military wounded
  • Over 1 million Iraqi & Afgan civilian deaths
  • Over 4 million displaced Iraqi civilians

We have a new President and a Democratic majority in Congress. Come help us put pressure on Obama and Congress to end the war and to cut the military budget by at least 20%.

Demonstrations are planned all over the U.S. A small sample:

  • San Francisco: 11:30 am, Market & Montgomery (near Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office).
  • Berkeley: 2 pm, University & Acton.
  • Oakland: 12 noon, Oakland Federal Bldg., 1301 Clay St.
  • Pasadena: 5 pm, Lake Ave & 210 freeway
  • San Diego: 4:30 pm, Rt. 67 and Dye Roads
  • Miami: 5:30pm, Pine Ridge & US 41
  • Chicago: 7 p.m., New Hope Church, 7115 W. Hood
  • Boston: 5 pm, Copley Square, Mass Ave. & Boylston
  • Find one near you.

More information is available at United for Peace & Justice website.

Support Congr. Barney Frank’s Defense Cut Proposal

December 4, 2008

Congressman Barney Frank recently proposed cutting the defense budget by 25%. His proposal was partly a response to the current economic recession (yes, it is officially a recession) because the money is needed at home, and partly in response to a growing consensus to declare victory in Iraq and begin reducing US troop levels there as soon as possible.

Frank isn’t the only one calling for military budget reductions.

  • On Nov 2, the New York Times printed an article surveying the many voices suggesting this.
  • Katrina vanden Heuvel supported Frank’s call for defense reductions in a Nov 19 article in The Nation.
  • David Harris had an Op Ed article in the SF Chronicle on Nov 25 arguing for ending the US military misadventure in Iraq ASAP.

Predictably, conservatives went absolutely ballistic over Frank’s proposal and are jumping all over him. To see this, just google “barney frank proposal defense cut” and skim through the thousands of hits you get. Most of them are conservative bloggers.

It is therefore important that progressives and peace advocates support Congressman Frank. Please write letters of support to your own congressional representatives and senators, and to Congressman Frank at:

Congressman Barney Frank
2252 Rayburn Bldg
Washington, DC 20515
-or-
29 Crafts St.
Newton, MA 02458

Int’l Peace Day Works in Afghanistan

September 24, 2008

For a change, some good news from Afghanistan: The United Nations International Day of Peace (Sept 21) seems to have been widely observed there.

In 1981, the U.N. designated September 21 as an Int’l Day of Peace to allow humanitarian relief efforts and evacuation of wounded and dead to be carried out safely. In 2001, they made it an annual event.

First, a brief story from the SF Chronicle News Digest, followed by links to related stories.


Peace Day Quiets Guns in Afghanistan

SF Chronicle, September 22, 2008

KABUL, Afghanistan — The United Nations said guns fell silent across much of Afghanistan on Sunday for an International Day of Peace that saw pledges by the U.S., NATO, the Afghan government, and the Taliban to halt attacks.

The U.N. said tens of thousands of international and Afghan soldiers, as well as Taliban militants, “all stood down from offensive military operations in support of the biggest International Peace Day effort that Afghanistan has known.”

Government officials around the country reported no violence, and several credited Peace Day efforts.


Related Stories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.